EasterC,
Sullivan Park Care Center, March 31, 2013 by Annette Fricke
Early on the first day of the week, we are told, while
it was still dark---If you have ever studied the gospel according to John, the
theme of dark and light runs throughout.
We first see it in chapter 1, verse 5: “The light shines in the
darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.” Raymond Brown, the late, great
scholar of John, writes: "In this Gospel, where light and darkness play
such a role, darkness lasts until someone believes in the risen Jesus."
Compliments of Apologetic Press, According to Eric Lyons, “Mary Magdalene is mentioned
a total of 12 times in the New Testament—the oldest historical record
mentioning her name. All 12 occurrences appear in the gospel accounts, wherein
we learn the following:
Jesus cast seven demons out of
her (Luke 8:2; Mark 16:9).
She was one of many who provided
for Jesus out of her own means (Luke 8:1-3).
She witnessed the crucifixion of
Christ (Matthew 27:56; Mark 15:40; John 19:25).
She was present at His burial
(Matthew 27:61; Mark 15:47).
She arrived at Jesus’ tomb on the
Sunday following His crucifixion to find His body missing (Matthew 28:1-8; Mark
16:1-8; Luke 24:1-7; John 20:1).
She saw the risen Lord, spoke
with Him, and later reported the encounter to the apostles (Matthew 28:9-10;
Mark 16:9-11; John 20:11-18).
Mary Magdalene apparently was a devout, faithful
follower of Christ. Not a shred of solid biblical or extra biblical evidence
suggests she played the role of harlot, wife, mother, or secret lover. The New
Testament, as the oldest, most reliable witness to her identity, testifies
loudly and clearly about her genuine faithfulness to the Lord, and keeps silent
about those things which twenty-first-century sensationalists allege.”
In addition to the above, there has been controversy
as to whether or not the other Marys mentioned in the New Testament are also
her or separate identities. I think I
will go with the separate identities since Mary seems to have been a very
common name for women during the time of Jesus and it only makes sense, as a
writer, knowing that it is a very common name that one does need to distinguish
which Mary is the subject at any given point in the narrative.
However, despite the confusion over which Mary was
where and did what, one thing is in agreement in all four gospels. Mary Magdalene is named in all of them as
being one of the very first witnesses to the resurrection. She, along with other women was the first to
arrive at the empty tomb, not the male disciples. In her confusion, she ran to tell the
disciples. She noticed that the stone
was moved, but didn’t go in. She did not walk.
She ran. She ran to Peter and the other disciples, perhaps only half
believing or half remembering that Jesus had said that he would rise from the
dead, half believing that perhaps his body was simply moved or stolen. We know that the stone would have been rolled
at an incline so as to make it very difficult to move the stone. We really
don’t know what her inner thoughts were but could probably assume that she was
scared as well. But we do know that she, who had been healed of seven demons by
Jesus, is now privileged to be one of the first to discover the empty tomb and
the possibility that her Lord has done something even greater. Could it be that
the incredible rising from death that Jesus talked about really did happen?
Could it be that we also can live in that life that Jesus talked about in his
earthly ministry? Could it be that Jesus’ deep love, commitment, and loyalty to
his disciples---the ones who travelled with him as well as those who believed
in him from a distance and those yet to believe---could it be that this is the
fulfillment of that love? Could it be
that there is a deep truth here, a longing fulfilled and yet far
surpassed? Perhaps the lyrics of “Alfie”
from 1966 that say, “Without true love, we just exist.” hit the nail on the
head. We were created in love by God to
be in relationship with God who not only loves us, but is love. Would that not be
the ultimate disappointment if God loves us from the point of our creation, but
then all dies with him and dwindles to nothing? This is the challenging part of
the story for most people. Did the
resurrection really happen? Will that
happen to us? Or rather, does that happen to us?
I know that for Mary Magdalene, the resurrection was
very real. She had been profoundly healed.
She had been very ill and now she was a committed disciple of Jesus, one who
contributed money to his ministry while he was on earth. She was there for Jesus’ crucifixion and
burial, faithful to what she thought was the end. That is how things end. I am sure she had seen it many times before:
people are born, they live here on earth, and then they die. End of story-- right? Without our belief in
Jesus as the Messiah of God, the ultimate Messiah who sets everything right,
who makes a new covenant with us, who completes the circle that always seemed
to be not quite right before---without that belief and the riveting reality of
resurrection, it is the end of the story.
What could the life of Jesus possibly mean if we don’t believe in the
transforming power of God in Jesus? What
does the Lord’s Supper mean if it is not Jesus’ transformation of his followers? What does baptism mean if Jesus is not raised
from the dead? What do all those stories
about healing and forgiveness mean if Jesus is not raised? In the words of Dr. Jerald
Daffe, “Mary Magdalene provides an example of the power of God to transform a
life. Regardless of the depths of sin into which one has fallen, he or she can
be rescued and changed into a new creation with a new purpose in life. Mary
Magdalene once suffered under the control of demons but was delivered to become
a disciple. Countless similar stories can be found throughout the history of
Christianity. The names are different, but the renewal is the same.” Think back to another Mary, the one who
anointed Jesus’ feet with expensive perfume, her hair, and her tears. She showed great sorrow, deep and genuine contrition
for her sin. When all around her
ridiculed both her and Jesus, Jesus stuck up for her and said to leave her
alone, that she is doing a good thing. When
I saw in the news that Pope Francis washed the feet of prisoners on Maundy
Thursday, I and many thought to ourselves, that he did a good thing. Next thing
I know, there is another press release titled, “Pope’s foot-wash a final straw
for traditionalists.” It turns out that
the offense was not because they were Muslim or prisoners, but some were
women. According to the liturgical rites,
this is not to happen because only men are to have their feet washed. Some saw it as promoting the ordination of
women. However, the Pope is apparently
against the ordination of women.
Without getting into this further, I think you can see
how it is that we end up with controversy over the meaning of stories in the
Bible. What strikes me the most is that
this pope seems to like more interaction with people and likes to do more than
just talk about things. He expressed
that he chose to take on the name of Francis because Francis of Assisi was a
champion of the poor. He also
demonstrated that by suggesting to the people of Argentina that they not come to his
enthronement as the new pope, but rather give their money they would have spent
to the poor. Jesus is not with us in the
same sense as he was with us on earth before the resurrection. All is now changed. It is transformed. John tells us that the
other disciple, who reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and
believed. "In
this Gospel, where light and darkness play such a role, darkness lasts until
someone believes in the risen Jesus."